Lê Hoàng Diệp Thảo speaks out, denying information about her private life and Ba Vàng Pagoda

Lê Hoàng Diệp Thảo publicly responded to information about her private life, saying she had never known the person referred to as “the master” and had never visited Ba Vàng Pagoda.

Illustrative portrait of Lê Hoàng Diệp Thảo with a headline about her denial of private-life information
30-second summary

Lê Hoàng Diệp Thảo publicly denied certain information concerning her private life and Ba Vàng Pagoda. The response appeared in a post on her Facebook page, cited by the press on September 28, 2026.

Thảo responds publicly

According to Tạp chí Thương hiệu và Sản phẩm on September 28, 2026, entrepreneur Lê Hoàng Diệp Thảo posted on her personal Facebook page in response to information about her private life circulating on social media.

In the published response, she said she had never known the person referred to as “the master” and had never visited Ba Vàng Pagoda. She also said she did not understand why a woman she did not know was making statements about her that she considered untrue.

Thảo emphasized each person’s responsibility for their words, actions and resulting consequences. Her response attracted attention on social media.

Screenshot of a verified Facebook post under the name Le Hoang Diep Thao, responding to information about her private life and Ba Vàng Pagoda
Screenshot of the response supplied by the sender, matching statements cited by the press. Engagement figures reflect the time of capture.

Distinguish statements from verified information

What can be established from the cited sources is that Lê Hoàng Diệp Thảo publicly denied claims concerning her. Descriptions of false information or harm to her reputation represent the positions she expressed in her response.

Circulating accounts and posts should not be treated as true simply because of their share counts or number of comments. Reporting Thảo’s response does not amount to a conclusion about the entire matter’s authenticity or the responsibility of any individual or organization.

Discuss with the community

Readers can discuss this information on Bài Học Kinh Doanh’s post. Comments express individual opinions and are not verification sources for the matter.

3 things business owners should know
  1. Thảo said she had never known the person referred to as “the master” and had never visited Ba Vàng Pagoda.
  2. Statements describing information as false in this article represent Thảo’s position.
  3. Social media comments and accounts do not in themselves verify the circulating claims.
Key takeaways

When receiving information affecting someone’s reputation, distinguish the involved person’s statements from facts independently verified.

Suggested actions

01Read the full response and cross-check sources before sharing.
02Discuss published information without speculation or personal attacks.

Sources and updates

Edited on September 30, 2026 from the response published by Tạp chí Thương hiệu và Sản phẩm on September 28, 2026, cross-checked against a screenshot of the Facebook post supplied by the sender. This article reports Thảo’s statements and does not independently confirm rumors. The cover image is an illustrative design using the supplied photo; the post screenshot retains its original content.

Last updated: 30 Sept 2026
Profile image: Ban Biên tập Bài Học Kinh Doanh
Author

Bài Học Kinh Doanh Editorial Team

Editorial Team | Bài Học Kinh Doanh

Ban Biên tập Bài Học Kinh Doanh tổng hợp và biên tập các nội dung về kinh doanh, thị trường, quản trị, công nghệ và khởi nghiệp, với mục tiêu giúp người đọc hiểu rõ vấn đề, nhìn thấy bài học phía sau dữ kiện và có thêm cơ sở cho các quyết định thực tế.

View author profile